Comments on: Back to blogging http://chrislintott.net/2007/10/15/back-to-blogging/ The Universe as seen from the perspective of an astronomical researcher, presenter and writer. Thu, 08 Jul 2010 19:50:01 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Procyan http://chrislintott.net/2007/10/15/back-to-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-21165 Procyan Sun, 21 Oct 2007 10:05:04 +0000 http://chrislintott.net/2007/10/15/back-to-blogging/#comment-21165 Thank you! I hope that data from the opposite quarter becomes available. If possible, I'd suggest keeping a lid on coordinates for the GZ analyzers. The design is stronger if they just don't know until its all over. These are certainly interesting times! Thank you! I hope that data from the opposite quarter becomes available. If possible, I’d suggest keeping a lid on coordinates for the GZ analyzers. The design is stronger if they just don’t know until its all over. These are certainly interesting times!

]]> By: chrislintott http://chrislintott.net/2007/10/15/back-to-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-21160 chrislintott Sun, 21 Oct 2007 08:24:23 +0000 http://chrislintott.net/2007/10/15/back-to-blogging/#comment-21160 Well, that's the thing. We thought we looking for a direction, but have found an excess of one type over the other. Of course, as Sloan covers about a quarter of the sky, that's perfectly consistent with there being a strong direction; we're working on finding some data from the opposite quarter of the sky. Well, that’s the thing. We thought we looking for a direction, but have found an excess of one type over the other. Of course, as Sloan covers about a quarter of the sky, that’s perfectly consistent with there being a strong direction; we’re working on finding some data from the opposite quarter of the sky.

]]> By: Procyan http://chrislintott.net/2007/10/15/back-to-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-21133 Procyan Sat, 20 Oct 2007 23:58:57 +0000 http://chrislintott.net/2007/10/15/back-to-blogging/#comment-21133 Hi Chris, great job(s) so far! This may be on the blogs but I cant find an answer. Regarding human bias, lets say there was a bias towards anti. Then you wouldn't see any directionality would you? All directions would look anti. But the whole buzz is about anti being associated with direction. Doesn't that require clockwise to be associated with the opposite direction? Else, I have a completely wrong picture. Can you shed some light? Hi Chris, great job(s) so far! This may be on the blogs but I cant find an answer. Regarding human bias, lets say there was a bias towards anti. Then you wouldn’t see any directionality would you? All directions would look anti. But the whole buzz is about anti being associated with direction.

Doesn’t that require clockwise to be associated with the opposite direction?

Else, I have a completely wrong picture. Can you shed some light?

]]> By: chrislintott http://chrislintott.net/2007/10/15/back-to-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-20941 chrislintott Thu, 18 Oct 2007 11:33:53 +0000 http://chrislintott.net/2007/10/15/back-to-blogging/#comment-20941 It's not known to me, but then getting from the metric to predicting galaxy rotation is a long road. Let's check the result is right first, and then see where we go from there. It’s not known to me, but then getting from the metric to predicting galaxy rotation is a long road. Let’s check the result is right first, and then see where we go from there.

]]> By: George Jones http://chrislintott.net/2007/10/15/back-to-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-20887 George Jones Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:21:38 +0000 http://chrislintott.net/2007/10/15/back-to-blogging/#comment-20887 Is there a known metric that gives both correlated galactic rotations and an expanding universe? Is there a known metric that gives both correlated galactic rotations and an expanding universe?

]]>