<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bang! now available in the US</title>
	<link>http://chrislintott.net/2008/04/30/bang-now-available-in-the-us/</link>
	<description>The Universe as seen from the perspective of an astronomical researcher, presenter and writer.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: chrislintott</title>
		<link>http://chrislintott.net/2008/04/30/bang-now-available-in-the-us/#comment-56051</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 09:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://chrislintott.net/2008/04/30/bang-now-available-in-the-us/#comment-56051</guid>
					<description>He was great - although most were minor and I still disagree with him on some points! The US edition contains all the corrections we've noticed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He was great - although most were minor and I still disagree with him on some points! The US edition contains all the corrections we&#8217;ve noticed.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dan Fischer</title>
		<link>http://chrislintott.net/2008/04/30/bang-now-available-in-the-us/#comment-54461</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 00:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://chrislintott.net/2008/04/30/bang-now-available-in-the-us/#comment-54461</guid>
					<description>The astronomer who did the translation for the German edition of "Bang!" told me that he sent a several pages of errors he found to the publisher and - after some resistance - was permitted to correct them. Wonder whether the U.S. edition has been vetted the same way, too ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The astronomer who did the translation for the German edition of &#8220;Bang!&#8221; told me that he sent a several pages of errors he found to the publisher and - after some resistance - was permitted to correct them. Wonder whether the U.S. edition has been vetted the same way, too &#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
